| 1 |
The purpose
of these guidelines is to establish a framework for the portfolio
route to full membership that will ensure a national standard
and consistency of application in Canada |
| 2 |
A candidate
may complete either the written examination or submit a portfolio
as part of fulfilling the requirements for full membership.
The requirements for education and experience would still be
applicable. Both routes, the written examination and the portfolio,
are equivalent in rigour and the administration of these routes
will be such to ensure equivalency. The procedure for administering
the portfolio including the setting and collection of a fee
shall be carried out by the respective Affiliate; |
| 3 |
The purpose
of the portfolio, comparable to the written examination, is
to assess that candidates have the planning knowledge and skills
required by the Institute. It provides a base for evaluating
knowledge of content (subject matter) and process (application
of subject matter) of planning; |
| 4 |
In order
to submit a portfolio, a candidate should have a substantial
amount of professional experience in planning to ensure that
the candidate has developed a body of work for submission as
a portfolio; |
| 5 |
A portfolio
shall consist of personal publications (ie: relevant professional
output). Authorship of any publication may be sole or shared.
In the case of jointly authored publications, the candidate
shall identify in the covering document those portions for which
the candidate was solely responsible as well as those portions
where responsibility was shared. In the latter case, the candidate
shall clearly identify the extent of the candidate’s participation
and responsibility relative to the other contributors; |
| 6.1 |
The candidate
shall submit a covering document with the portfolio which shall
clearly explain how the candidate considers that the items contained
within the portfolio address the three areas covered by the
written examination:
i: Awareness and understanding of interrelationships impinging
on planning problems;
ii: Formulation of plans and policies;
iii: Implementation of plans and policies. |
| 6.2 |
The covering
document must show both practical and theoretical knowledge,
and ability to conceptualize and think critically using the
submitted works in the portfolio to demonstrate this. The covering
document must also provide some evaluation from the candidates
perspective of the work experience contained in the portfolio
submission; |
| 6.3 |
If a candidate’s
work experience does not provide the candidate with an adequate
portfolio of work to address the areas noted in 6.1, then the
candidate should sit the written exam; |
| 7.1 |
The portfolio
shall be read by a minimum of two examiners of the Institute.
Two examiners must record a 'pass' in order for a candidate
to have successfully completed this requirement for membership.
For an examiner to award the outcome of 'pass' the candidate's
covering document and portfolio must satisfy the three areas
covered by the written examination (6.1). If the portfolio is
judged to be a ‘fail’ the candidate shall be given reasons and
guidance for subsequent resubmission |
| 7.2 |
In cases
where material from acknowledged sources is presented as being
the candidate’s own material the entire portfolio shall be disqualified;
|
| 8 |
If the examiners
determine that one of the areas covered by the examination questions
is not adequately fulfilled through the portfolio, the provisional
member may write the relevant question of the written examination; |
| 9 |
A candidate
may resubmit a portfolio at any time; |
| 10 |
An affiliate
may determine that a candidates portfolio may be supplemented
by an oral interview. Because the portfolio is equivalent to
the written examination, this interview is not a substitute
for a well-prepared portfolio with a cogent, well-structured
covering document. In addition, this interview is not a substitute
for the oral interview testing ethics and professionalism required
under Section 4.1 of Schedule A, By-law No. 1, as amended. |
| 11 |
The appeal
provisions contained in section 6, Schedule A, By-law No. 1,
as amended, are applicable to the portfolio. |